Its a waste of time discussing Scriptures with people who do not believe what they read. I agree and would add the word "understand" to that sentence, but who are the "they" that do not believe what they read? In my view the small number that post here believe what they read however some may strugg...

There is something to be said for adding things to God's word and also making it mean something that is not there. Who is denying hell? I may have missed someone posted that, but I do not deny hell's existence. Dake does not even state what is stated here on this subject. At any rate it is important...

Ironman, re: "'Rev. 14:9-11 also proves that men will be tormented in the presence of God and angels forever.'" I don't see where those verses prove or say that. While they do say that there will be torment in fire and brimstone, they don't say that the torment will continue forever, i.e., never en...

branham1965, re: "Trust me he would turn all of us inside out with his knowledge. I am NOT boot licking.Its the truth. Ask him." So you don't know the scriptures Dake uses to say that meeting for rest and worship on the 1st day of the week was an ongoing activity that was observed by the believers ...

What about all the other days Paul met with the disciples and preached? Are those days of worship and gathering and should saints make any one of those days the day of gathering or worship? No doubt an interesting dichotomy.

Was it wrong for God to tell Moses to cover the Ark of the Covenant and furniture and vessels with pure God? Wouldn't wood without all the gold been OK in worship? And in the NT was it wrong for Jesus to multiplied food for the 5,000 and NOT have multiplied enough for ALL the poor in Israel? And wh...

As far as material wealth, it is my belief that outside of the Father, Jesus was the wealthiest to ever set foot on the earth. There were certainly others like Lucifer, Job, Solomon, etc, yet none with the wealth that Jesus held. One neat thing He did was pay the taxes for TWO men with the coin out ...

Looks like I am the only one that said NO to this :mrgreen: Looks as if you overlooked my first posting on this.. "From the title of your post... "Should people name churches after themselves" I would generally say NO. However, naming a church after oneself is different than having a church named a...

BTW, anybody heading out to the "Church of Paul" or the "Church of Peter" this weekend?

I think the test is does the Power fall??? 2.Are souls saved,bodies healed,miracles wrought and the chains of darkness broken in the name of Jesus. If so :angel: If not :neutral: It is a fake no matter what the name on the building. The power is not of men and this is very often the problem we see ...